· Updated
Learn how to size and split a cybersecurity marketing budget across brand, demand, content, and events, with realistic cost ranges by stage.
Luke "hakluke" Stephens
Author
Most cybersecurity companies spend somewhere between 7% and 15% of revenue on marketing, with earlier-stage and high-growth firms pushing toward the upper end and beyond. A seed-stage startup chasing its first 100 customers might run hotter, while a profitable enterprise vendor often sits lower as a percentage but spends far more in raw dollars. The right number depends on your growth targets, sales motion, and how crowded your category is.
Security buyers have gotten harder to reach and slower to commit. Budgets are scrutinized, buying committees have grown, and a CISO will happily ignore a vendor they don't already trust. At the same time, a large majority of cybersecurity companies plan to increase their marketing spend year over year, which means the competition for attention keeps getting more expensive. If you set your budget by feel or by copying last year's number, you'll either underfund the channels that actually move pipeline or pour money into ones that don't. Getting the size and the split right is the difference between marketing that compounds and marketing that just burns.
This post sits underneath our broader guide to cybersecurity marketing, so if you want the full strategic picture, start there and use this as the budgeting deep dive.
There are two sane ways to land on a budget figure. Most good teams use a blend of both.
This is the quick gut-check method. You take a percentage of current or projected revenue and call that your marketing envelope. For B2B software, 7% to 15% is a common band. Security companies often skew toward the higher side because the categories are competitive and the sales cycles are long, which means you're funding awareness for months before a deal closes.
The trouble with percentage-of-revenue is that it's backward-looking. If revenue is small, your budget is small, even when the opportunity in front of you is huge. So treat it as a sanity boundary, not a plan.
This is the method that actually tells you what to spend. You start from a revenue or pipeline target, work backward through your funnel, and price out what it takes to hit it.
Goal-based budgeting forces you to know your numbers, and it exposes fantasy targets fast. If the math says you need 4,000 qualified leads and your best channel produces 200 a quarter, you've found the problem before you've spent a dollar. To build this model properly you need clean funnel data, which is exactly what our guide to cybersecurity marketing metrics walks through.
A budget number is useless until you decide how to spend it. The hard part in security marketing is balancing the stuff that captures demand today against the stuff that creates demand for next year.
A reasonable starting split for a growth-stage security company looks something like this. Adjust to your category and motion.
Two channels deserve their own sections because they behave differently in security than in almost any other industry.
Security keywords are some of the priciest in all of B2B. You're bidding against well-funded vendors for a tiny, high-value audience, and the terms that signal real buying intent attract everyone at once. CPCs for premium category terms like SIEM, MDR, and zero trust have climbed sharply over the last few years, and they keep climbing as more vendors pile into the same auctions.
On LinkedIn, cost per lead in cybersecurity commonly runs roughly $80 to $250, and clicks on campaigns tightly targeted at CISOs can run roughly $40 to $100 each. Those numbers aren't a reason to avoid paid. They're a reason to be disciplined about it, target narrowly, and feed your ads strong creative and offers. We go deep on managing this in our breakdown of cybersecurity paid media.
Most teams overfund capture and underfund creation. Capture channels like branded search and retargeting look great in a dashboard because they convert, but they're mostly harvesting demand that brand and content already created. If you only fund capture, you slowly run out of demand to capture. Splitting spend so a meaningful slice goes to creating new demand is what keeps your pipeline from drying up. Our guide to cybersecurity demand generation covers how to balance the two without starving either.
Numbers help. Here's a rough orientation for what things tend to cost in security marketing. Treat these as planning ranges, not quotes, since your category and targeting move them a lot.
| Channel | Typical cost range | What you're really paying for |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn cost per lead | ~$80 to $250 | Precise targeting of a small, senior audience |
| CISO-targeted clicks | ~$40 to $100 | Competition for the hardest buyer to reach |
| Premium search terms (SIEM, MDR, zero trust) | High and rising CPCs | Crowded auctions full of funded vendors |
| Technical content / SEO | Mid four to low five figures per month | Credibility and compounding organic reach |
| Industry conference sponsorship | Five figures and up per event | In-person trust and pipeline conversations |
One thing worth funding regardless of stage: proof. Case studies strongly influence security purchase decisions, and a single strong customer story often outperforms a quarter of paid spend at moving a deal forward. Budget for producing them.
The right allocation shifts a lot depending on where you are. A startup proving it can sell anything has different priorities than an enterprise defending category leadership.
| Stage | Marketing as % of revenue | Primary focus | Where the money tends to go |
|---|---|---|---|
| Startup / seed | 15%+ (often funded from raise, not revenue) | Finding repeatable demand | Founder-led content, targeted paid tests, a few sharp events |
| Growth / Series B-C | ~10% to 15% | Scaling what works, building brand | Balanced split across brand, demand capture, content, events |
| Enterprise | ~7% to 12% | Defending category, supporting sales | Brand at scale, ABM, analyst relations, large field programs |
Early on, your budget's real job is to find out what works. You can't afford broad brand plays, so concentrate spend on a narrow audience, lean on founder credibility, and run small paid experiments you can read quickly. Don't expand a channel until it's proven it can produce pipeline at a cost you can live with.
This is where the pressure to over-index on capture is strongest, because the board wants efficient pipeline now. Hold the line on brand and content spend even when it's harder to attribute, because that's what keeps capture cheap. Growth-stage teams that gut their brand budget usually pay for it 12 months later with rising lead costs.
At enterprise scale the percentage drops but the absolute dollars are large, and a bigger share goes to brand, analyst relations, and account-based programs that support a field sales team. The job shifts toward staying top of mind across long buying committees and giving sales the air cover to close.
Most land between 7% and 15% of revenue. Earlier-stage and high-growth companies tend to run at the top of that range or above, often funding spend from a raise rather than revenue, while profitable enterprise vendors usually sit lower as a percentage but spend far more in absolute dollars.
You're competing for a small, senior, well-defended audience. Premium category keywords like SIEM, MDR, and zero trust attract a lot of funded vendors bidding at once, which pushes CPCs up. LinkedIn cost per lead commonly runs roughly $80 to $250, and CISO-targeted clicks can run $40 to $100 each.
A reasonable growth-stage split is roughly 20% to 30% brand, 20% to 30% demand capture, 15% to 25% content and SEO, 10% to 25% events, and 5% to 10% tooling. The key is to keep funding demand creation, not just the capture channels that look efficient in a dashboard.
More as a percentage, less in absolute dollars. Startups spend to learn what works and find repeatable demand, so the budget concentrates on a narrow audience and small experiments. Enterprises spend a smaller percentage but much larger sums on brand, analyst relations, and account-based programs.
If you want help sizing your spend, building the funnel model behind it, and putting it to work across the channels that move security buyers, get in touch with the HackerContent team. We build content and demand programs for cybersecurity companies and we'll help you spend every dollar where it counts.
Written by
Luke "hakluke" StephensLuke "hakluke" Stephens is the founder of HackerContent and a well-known offensive security researcher. He helps cybersecurity companies grow by turning deep technical expertise into marketing that earns the trust of a skeptical, technical audience.
Cybersecurity marketing is hard because security buyers doubt everything. Here's how to position, pick channels, and build pipeline that actually holds up.
A practical cybersecurity go-to-market strategy for security vendors: ICP, positioning, the buying committee, channels, pricing, and the metrics that matter.
B2B cybersecurity marketing is its own discipline. Here's how to earn trust, map the buying committee, and win skeptical security buyers over long cycles.
Drop us your email, we'll be in touch!
